The Irony of Atheism

Atheists claim that Atheism is not a religion because it is a disbelief in a supernatural being of any kind whether God or gods. However Atheism is itself a “Belief” that claims that God or gods do not exist that also requires of its adherents a “leap of Faith” without a single shred of evidence to support it; while those who claim to be Atheists tend to gravitate towards the system of human ethical beliefs – known as humanism.

While Atheism removes God or gods from the equation Humanism – on the other hand – enthrones/substitutes man’s wisdom in the place once reserved for Divinity. A secular religion that is undermined by its adherents willful blindness in regards to man’s fallen nature, which leads to the false conclusion that man has no need of redemption.

Consequently any movement or political system based upon Atheism and Humanism – Marxism,  Communism and/or Catholicism: Humanism masquerading as a religion fo example – without fail end up enslaving and persecuting the very one’s they claim to represent and serve.

Making Atheists no better than those Christians in name only, who give full reign to the evil lurking within their own unregenerate hearts, in spite of their profession to believe in the Father Above.

One need only to look at the historical record of Russia and East Germany under the reign of Communism: A political system based upon Atheism and Humanism. Whose leaders enslaved and murdered their own people and allowed their air, land and water to become heavily polluted with industrial wastes. To fully understand not only what the fruits of Atheism and Humanism look like; as well as just how willfully delusional are those modern day individuals who claim to be Atheists and follow the tenets of the secular religion known as Humanism.


The Unfortunate Consequences of Feminine Immodesty

1TIM 2:9 & 10:

“In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.”

Down through the years women have blasted men for treating them as sex objects, making unwanted passes at them and outright sexual harassment. So it has simply become a matter of rolling the eyes and shaking one’s head as here we go again whenever a case such as the “Standford Rapist” comes along.

The simple truth is that men were created to become sexually aroused whenever they saw their wife’s naked body while the Father Above implanted within women a sense of modesty that was designed to prevent them from exposing their nakedness to anyone but their lawful husband.

Madison Avenue certainly understands that men are by nature visually aroused which is why they use scantily clad pictures of photo shopped genetic celebrities (women who are sexy because they are young and fertile) to sell their products.

What the feminists won’t admit is that the average woman whether she is worldly or a Christian is well aware of the affects her fertile sexuality has upon the men she comes in contact with. Indeed that is why she chooses to leave the sanctuary of her home in order to appear in public with the curves of her body clad and clearly outlined in skintight jeans and shirts that are in reality at least one size if not more too small. As well as the low cut dresses whose plunging neckline not only points to her breasts; but exposes the top of her bosom to the eyes of any male onlooker whether he views her from behind while she is sitting down or when her breasts nearly fall out of her dress whenever she bends over for what ever reason. And the short shirts that give the causal observer a clear view of her nether regions when they ride up her legs as she gets up and down and moves around.

Just as Dinah, the daughter of Jacob, placed herself in the position to be sexually assaulted (Genesis Chapter 34) when she left the safety of her father’s home in order to visit the ungodly daughters of the land in which her family dwelled.

Just as a drunk driver whether male or female fully consents to the tragic consequences of their actions when they choose to get behind the wheel of a vehicle after having too much to drink.

So too do women whether ungodly or Christian fully consent to the consequences of being whistled at, commented upon, sexually harassed and or sexually assaulted by the way she dresses. All of which she has invited by choosing to ignore and defy the Biblical Counsel to dress and comport herself with modesty in order to indulge her sinful and prideful nature by dressing provocatively while appearing in public.

Indeed the woman who chooses to expose her nakedness and leave nothing to the imagination by the scanty clothing she deliberately chooses to wear out in public. Is just as guilty and as much a sexual pervert as the man who uninvitedly exposes himself to women and children.

Ladies (and I do indeed use this word loosely) your sanctimonious and faux outrage whenever a male showers upon you unwanted attention simply won’t wash any longer. So long as you continue to invite that treatment by the way you deliberately choose to put the curves of your physical assets upon display like candy in a store window by the way you dress.

“My Kingdom Is Not Of This World”

John 18:36 –

Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.


John 16:2-3 –

They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.

And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me.


Matthew 22:29 –

Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.


Matthew 7:21-23 –

Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.



Throughout His ministry Christ had made it clear that He had come to establish a Spiritual Kingdom as opposed to the Earthly Kingdom the Jews were expecting at His First Coming due to their misinterpretation of the Scriptures. Then while standing before Pilate during His trial before the Roman Governor Jesus clearly stated that His kingdom is not of the this world else His servants – the Angels – would fight to prevent Him from being delivered to the Jews.

Previously Christ had informed His disciples that the day would come when those who persecuted them and those who would come after them would think that they were serving God. This prophecy was fulfilled to the letter during the Middle Ages (also known as the Dark Ages) when leaders of the Roman Catholic Church (also known as the Papacy) had those who wouldn’t conform to their false doctrines put to death. Proving beyond the shadow of a doubt that the “Little Horn Power” which sought to “wear out the saints of the Most High” in the book of Daniel and the “Man of Sin” mentioned by the Apostle Paul in his second epistle to the Thessalonians is indeed the Papacy.

Fully aware of the history of religious tyranny and persecution in Europe by the Catholic Church that lasted for one thousand two hundred and sixty years. The Founding Fathers of the fledgling Democratic Republic known as the United States of America sought to secure the individuals right to religious liberty and to prevent the occurrence of religious tyranny and persecution by building a “Wall of Separation” between the Church and the State in the US Constitution.

Unfortunately today there are those who are seeking to tear down the wall of separation between the church and the state in order to impose their own brand of religious tyranny on the citizens of the United States by force of law. In order to convince their followers to support their misguided efforts they have misrepresented and rewritten history as well as wrested the Scriptures to the damnation of both themselves and their uninformed followers.

Christ also made it crystal clear that those who persecuted His followers during the following centuries would do so because they knew neither Him nor His Father. And yet would be so deceived that they thought that they were serving God. The Word of God is quite clear and those who are members of the Religious Right here in America along with their supporters need to take a good hard look at their beliefs and compare them with the Scriptures.

Otherwise the Greatest tragedy (they will discover far too late to repent and be saved) will occur when they realize, that instead of coming up in the first resurrection when Christ comes back the second time sitting on the clouds of glory, they have come up out of their graves in the second resurrection of damnation. When our Lord and Savior will tell these false Christians to depart from Him into the everlasting fire reserved for Satan and His angels.

Leaven = Meme = Intellectual Virus

A MEME is an idea or intellectual concept that spreads from person to person throughout society. Both Jesus and Paul used Leaven to illustrate this same concept in the experience of those who accept Christ as their Savior from sin and worldly corruption. I simply call it an Intellectual Virus.

Gal. 5:9 –

A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.

The woman good man bad – men are abusers women are victims meme’s that has already transformed Western Society and nearly succeeding in destroying the family composed of a man and a woman. That is today infiltrating and ever so slowly leavening the Seventh-day Adventist Church just as it has already wrecked havoc upon many other Protestant Denominations.. Through the efforts of unconverted church members and leaders infected with the intellectual virus of feminism. Is one of Satan’s masterpieces of deception that he is using to lead both the laity and the leadership of the Seventh-day Adventist church off course.

Until a critical mass of individuals within the Seventh-day Church and other Protestant Denominations choose to wake up and realize that women are just as abusive towards their intimate partners and their children. The misguided individuals infected with the man bad woman good – men are abusers women are victims mene’s will continue to repel and drive men away from both Christ and the church.

The only solution is for Seventh-day Adventist’s and other infected Protestant Denominations, both individually and corporately, is to throughly repent and allow Christ to remove the intellectual virus of feminism from their hearts by “Loving their Neighbors as Themselves” and putting into practice:

Rev. 3: 14 -20:

And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see. As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent. Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.

The Nature of Christ

Genesis 3:14-15:

And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

Isaiah 7:14:

Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

John 1:14:

And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Romans 8:3:

For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

Hebrews 2:14-18:

Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;

And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.

For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.

For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted.


The argument over the Nature of Christ is a lot like the argument” Which came first the chicken or the egg. And is just like a dog chasing his tail – round and round he goes but never manages to catch his tail.

Fallen Humanity = Likeness of Sinful Flesh = Adams Nature after the fall…

Sinless Divinity + Fallen Humanity = God in the flesh/Jesus Christ…

Jesus was sinless when He joined with and became one with Fallen Humanity and overcame sin in the flesh despite the disadvantage of being joined with/at one with Fallen Humanity. Perfecting a Righteous Character by the very same means available to the sons and daughters of Adam – an ongoing relationship with His Father through the agency of the Holy Spirit. Proving beyond the shadow of doubt that Fallen Humanity United with Divinity/Jesus through the agency of the Holy Spirit can indeed keep the law and overcome Sin in the Flesh despite the disadvantage of having inherited Adams Fallen Nature.

It really is that simple…

Why Bullying – Sociopathic Behavior – Is So Common

The Difference In A Sociopath and A Psychopath

The primary difference in a Sociopath and a Psychopath is this: A sociopath is a cowardly Predator who manipulates someone else – an unwitting or willfully blind proxy – into  doing their dirty work and/or into  pulling the trigger for them.  While a Psychopath is a predator who has the courage to commit their  own crimes instead of duping someone else to do it for them.

There are four kinds or Types of sociopaths:

1) Those who are born without a sense of empathy for others…

2) Those who are made into social paths by resisting and/or fighting back against the person bullying them…

3) Those who chose not to exercise empathy towards others and/or intentionally prey on another person…

4) Those who are taught to be a sociopath because they are superior to others…

The best way to identify a sociopath is through careful observation of their behavior patterns over time.

True sociopaths – those who are born that way – are some what rare while those who chose to be social paths are extremely common.

A sociopath is an individual who believes they have the absolute right to prey on others because they are superior.

Believes that they have the right to exploit the labor of others for their own profit.

That they are above the law.

Engage in sociopathic behavior in the outright theft of the property and natural resources of a less powerful group.

Seeks employment in organizations that allow them to have power over others in order to abuse that power.

Resorts to emotional abuse and implied violence in order to get their way.

Uses dishonest intellectual arguments to bolster their opinions in order to deceive others.

Believe they are entitled to having their own cake while eating someone else’s.

Examples of sociopaths both past and present:


The Republican Party

The Democratic party



Christians In Name Only

The One Percent

Sharon Osborne who thinks that it is funny when a woman brutally sexually mutilates her intimate partner

Women who divorce their husbands for non Biblical reasons, falsely accuse their husbands and/or the father of their children of Domestic Violence, child and sexual abuse and manipulate their children into turning against their fathers.

Members of the court and law enforcement who both aid and abet women in legally and financially abusing the former love of their life.

Those who chose to be sociopaths are quite common, come from all walks of life and tend to congregate in these professions: CEO’s of major corporations, Lawyers, Judges, Politicians, Management and the Health Care System: Doctors, Nurses etc.

Those who stand outside prisons celebrating the death of a individual being put to death by the state.

Why Sociopath’s Are So Common

This article is based upon my own personal observations of individuals  who willfully engaged in harmful acts towards others and myself  without seeming to have a personal sense of remorse. Indeed  the conclusions I have reached are the result of over forty years of personal observation; and is the only rational and logical way that I have come up with to fully explain and make sense of their behavior without excusing them.

One must first have a working definition of what a Sociopath is and that entails defining the harmful and negative behavior they engage in towards others as Sociopathic. I personally define Sociopathic Behavior as any behavior that causes harm to another individual whether it be physical, emotional or mental abuse. Hence I define a Sociopath as an individual who willfully engages in Sociopathic behavior by harming others without a sense of remorse.

If true Sociopaths are rare being approximately 1 – 5 % of the population then why do so many “NORMAL” average individuals willfully choose to harm others by engaging in Sociopathic behavior without even the slightest hint of remorse?

How did Hitler – a Sociopath – manage to convince an entire nation of mostly “NORMAL” individuals to persecute and murder six millions jews without a sense of remorse?

Why do men willfully bully other males without a sense of remorse and justify their actions by calling it male bonding?

Why do male and female bullies single out the one individual in their group who is different in some way from the others to heap their scorn upon without a sense of remorse?

Unless Sociopaths are far more common then anyone thinks then their can be only one answer; and that is that the CONSCIENCE which gives one their sense of right and wrong and the ability to govern their behavior towards others can be subverted or entirely switched off. So that engaging in sociopathic behavior that harms others becomes perfectly normal and justified.

Hence rich families teach their children that they are entitled to their unearned wealth and that others who aren’t as wealthy are worthless, shiftless and lazy. Small wonder that these children then end up abusing the power they have over others who are less wealthy without a sense of remorse.

Racists are taught to hold other races as inferior to their own and deserve the contempt they heap upon them.

As a general rule individuals who engage in sociopathic behavior habitually consider themselves to be superior to others – whom they hold in contempt – and believe that they are entitled to prey upon.  Instead of esteeming others better than themselves as the Bible teaches: those who engage in sociopathic behavior towards others hold themselves up as the standard by which they measure everyone else and judge all those who fail to measure up as inferior and unworthy and hold them in contempt.

Consequently Sociopaths are not only born but there are those who intentionally chose to be Sociopaths and others who are taught/trained to be Sociopaths. For anyone who chooses to engage in Sociopathic Behavior by harming others, whether without remorse or avoids feeling remorseful by subverting or turning off their conscience by justifying their actions, is in my own humble opinion a SOCIOPATH.

Not Much of a Difference

Both liberals and conservatives arrogantly claim the moral high ground in regards to abortion as a means of birth control: the willful act of murdering a child in it’s mother’s womb.

Unfortunately for liberals once one gets past their claim that a woman has the absolute right to control her own body. By coming to the realization that her actions in seeking an abortion as a means of birth control, is in itself an acknowledgment that she failed to exercise proper control of her body in the first place. The validity and morality of their argument utterly fails when liberals both deny the personhood of the child growing within their mother’s womb. Then demand that those who find such an act of murder despicable pay for the abortion through the tax dollars they are forced to pay by their own government at the point of a gun – force of law – in taxes.

On the other hand the conservative argument also fails because by using the power of the government to impose their own narrow minded moral viewpoint on another. Gives credence to the interference of individual personal liberties by the overreaching hand of government they all too often rail about in other debates on other social issues.

Neither are the hands of the conservatives clean nor are they free of the stain of immorality for even though they oppose abortion as a means of birth control. Modern day conservatives have absolutely no qualms about allowing the child they save from the abortionist’s hands stained with innocent blood. To die by starving to death from malnutrition or lack of medical care if the child’s parents can’t afford food or medical care – even through no fault of their own – by opposing the programs put into place to alleviate child poverty and universal healthcare for all citizens.

Hence the moral posturing of liberal’s and conservative’s on the issue of abortion as a means of birth control is neither moral nor acceptable and can only be characterized as ABSOLUTELY REPUGNANT!